↓ Skip to main content

The Gut Microbiota and Dysbiosis in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 993)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
The Gut Microbiota and Dysbiosis in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11910-018-0887-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather K. Hughes, Destanie Rose, Paul Ashwood

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence indicating the gut microbiota influence neurodevelopment and behavior. The purposes of this review are to provide an overview of studies analyzing the microbiota and their metabolites in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and to discuss the possible mechanisms of action involved in microbial influence on the brain and behavior. The microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis has been extensively studied in animal models, and it is clear that alterations in the composition of microbiota alter neurological and behavioral outcomes. However, findings in human studies are less abundant. Although there are several studies so far showing altered microbiota (dysbiosis) in ASD, the results are heterogeneous and often contradictory. Intervention studies such as fecal microbiota transplant therapies show promise and lend credence to the involvement of the microbiota in ASD. A role for the microbiota in ASD is likely; however, further studies elucidating microbial or metabolomic signatures and mechanisms of action are needed. Future research should focus on intervention studies that can identify specific metabolites and immune mediators that improve with treatment to help identify etiologies and pathological mechanisms of ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 339 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 16%
Student > Master 40 12%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 16 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 129 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 10%
Neuroscience 34 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 9%
Psychology 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 138 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#822,179
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#27
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,477
of 351,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.