↓ Skip to main content

Drug checking at an electronic dance music festival during the public health overdose emergency in British Columbia

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Public Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,278)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Drug checking at an electronic dance music festival during the public health overdose emergency in British Columbia
Published in
Canadian Journal of Public Health, September 2018
DOI 10.17269/s41997-018-0126-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvina C. Mema, Chloe Sage, Yuhui Xu, Kenneth W. Tupper, Daniel Ziemianowicz, Karen McCrae, Mark Leigh, Matthew Brendan Munn, Deanne Taylor, Trevor Corneil

Abstract

Shambhala is a 5-day electronic dance music (EDM) festival held in rural British Columbia that annually hosts between 15,000 and 18,000 people on a 500-acre ranch. The AIDS Network Outreach & Support Society (ANKORS) has provided harm reduction services throughout the duration of the festival since 2003, including point-of-care drug checking, which allows real-time testing of illicit substances to assess their composition. Drug checking results are provided directly to clients and displayed in aggregate on a screen for all attendees to see. In 2017, ANKORS added fentanyl checking to their repertoire of drug checking technologies for festivalgoers. Volunteers used a brief survey to collect information on what clients expected the samples to contain. Volunteers carried out drug checks and subsequently logged test results. ANKORS provided an amnesty bin at the tent for clients who chose to discard their substances. Of the 2683 surveys, 2387 included data on both the client's belief and the actual test result. Clients were more likely to discard when the test result differed from their belief (5.16%) than when their belief was confirmed (0.69%). Discarding increased to 15.54% when the test could not clearly identify a substance and to 30.77% if the client did not have a prior belief of the substance. Of 1971 samples tested for fentanyl, 31 tested positive and 16.13% of clients discarded compared to 2.63% in the negative group. Drug checking services appeal to festivalgoers who, when faced with uncertainty, may discard their substances. This innovative harm reduction service allows for a personalized risk discussion, potentially reaching others via word-of-mouth and early warning systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#640,010
of 24,221,802 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#41
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,474
of 344,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,221,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.