You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
在宅医療における薬剤師の役割に対するケアマネジャーの意識調査―テキストマイニングによる客観的解析―
|
---|---|
Published in |
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.14442/generalist.41.92 |
Authors |
今西 孝至, 岡村 美代子, 川端 崇義, 髙山 明, 楠本 正明 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,153,309
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#6
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,790
of 347,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.