You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wearable Cardioverter–Defibrillator after Myocardial Infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1800781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey E Olgin, Mark J Pletcher, Eric Vittinghoff, Jerzy Wranicz, Rajesh Malik, Daniel P Morin, Steven Zweibel, Alfred E Buxton, Claude S Elayi, Eugene H Chung, Eric Rashba, Martin Borggrefe, Trisha F Hue, Carol Maguire, Feng Lin, Joel A Simon, Stephen Hulley, Byron K Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 326 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 86 | 26% |
| Spain | 25 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Mexico | 8 | 2% |
| Colombia | 7 | 2% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Argentina | 6 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 112 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 217 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 16% |
| Scientists | 45 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 69 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#96,340
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,472
of 32,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,858
of 352,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#79
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.