↓ Skip to main content

Executive Summary of the 2018 Joint Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Executive Summary of the 2018 Joint Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Italy
Published in
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40292-018-0278-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Volpe, Allegra Battistoni, Giovanna Gallo, Speranza Rubattu, Giuliano Tocci, the Writing Committee, On behalf of the Scientific Societies

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death, disability and hospitalization in Italy. Primary prevention strategies are able to prevent clinically evident CVDs, mostly by early identifying asymptomatic, otherwise healthy individuals at risk of developing CVDs. A more modern approach recommended for effective CVD prevention is based on "4P", that is: Predictive, Preventive, Personalized and Participative. This executive document reflects the key points of a consensus paper on CV prevention in Italy, realized though the contribution of different Italian Scientific Societies and the National Research Council, and coordinated by the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC), published in 2018. The need for such document relies on the difficulty to apply "sic et simpliciter" European guidelines, to which this document is largely inspired, to national, regional and local realities, in this Mediterranean country, namely Italy. Indeed, our Country has specific features in terms of demography, socio-cultural habits, distribution and prevalence of risk factors, organization, policy and access to National Health Service compared to other European countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 43 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Psychology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 46 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,990,409
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
#155
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,210
of 342,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.