↓ Skip to main content

Thrombosis, anticoagulation and outcomes in malignant superior vena cava syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Thrombosis, anticoagulation and outcomes in malignant superior vena cava syndrome
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11239-018-1747-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy Ratzon, Shlomit Tamir, Tal Friehmann, Nir Livneh, Elizabeth Dudnik, Alon Rozental, Orly Hamburger-Avnery, David Pereg, Estela Derazne, Baruch Brenner, Pia Raanani, Hugo ten Cate, Galia Spectre, Avi Leader

Abstract

Anticoagulation is often used in superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) associated with cancer (i.e malignant SVCS), even without thrombosis, but its effect on outcomes has not been reported. We aimed to determine factors and outcomes associated with thrombosis and anticoagulation in malignant SVCS. Patients with malignant SVCS diagnosed on computerized tomography (CT) were retrospectively included, indexed at diagnosis and followed for 6 months using medical records. The cohort included 183 patients with malignant SVCS of which 153 (84%) were symptomatic. Thirty of the 127 patients (24%) with a reviewable baseline CT had thrombosis of the SVC or tributaries at diagnosis. Patients with baseline thrombosis more often had symptomatic SVCS (p < 0.01). 70% (21/30) of patients with thrombosis and 52% (49/97) of those without thrombosis at baseline received anticoagulation, most often at therapeutic doses. Thrombosis occurred in 5/39 patients with anticoagulation (13%) compared to 2/18 (11%) of those without, during follow-up (p = 0.85). Anticoagulation was associated with a reduction in risk of SVC stent placement during follow-up that did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.2-1.13, p = 0.09). Major bleeding occurred in 7 (4%) patients, six of whom received anticoagulation (four therapeutic and two intermediate dose). Neither thrombosis nor anticoagulation affected survival. Anticoagulation is commonly used as primary prevention but its benefit remains to be proven. The role of reduced-dose anticoagulation in non-thrombotic malignant SVCS should be prospectively assessed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%