| Title |
Current and Future Use of Insertable Cardiac Monitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaun Giancaterino, Florentino Lupercio, Marin Nishimura, Jonathan C Hsu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 14% |
| United States | 8 | 9% |
| Mexico | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 9% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#856,364
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#123
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,076
of 345,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.