↓ Skip to main content

Avocado–soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) for osteoarthritis – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 3,000)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Avocado–soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) for osteoarthritis – a systematic review
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10067-003-0731-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Ernst

Abstract

Patients suffering from osteoarthritis (OA) are often tempted to try 'alternative' treatment options. Avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) have shown some promise for OA. This systematic review is aimed at critically evaluating the data from rigorous clinical trials of ASU. Six databases were searched for randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of ASU. Four studies could be included. Key data were extracted according to predefined criteria and tabulated as well as discussed in narrative form. The methodological quality of the four studies was high. They included patients with OA of the knee and hip. The dose of ASU was 300 mg/day and one trial also included a group treated with 600 mg/day. Three of the four trials suggested efficacy of ASU for improving the symptoms of OA. The majority of rigorous trial data available to date suggest that ASU is effective for the symptomatic treatment of OA and more research seems warranted. However, the only real long-term trial yielded a largely negative result.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#526,945
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#30
of 3,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#412
of 51,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.