↓ Skip to main content

Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Training: Time Beats Quantity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Training: Time Beats Quantity
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10162-018-00689-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Muntaseer Mahfuz, Michael C. Schubert, William V. C. Figtree, Christopher J. Todd, Americo A. Migliaccio

Abstract

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main gaze stabilising system during rapid head movements. The VOR is highly plastic and its gain (eye/head velocity) can be increased via training that induces an incrementally increasing retinal image slip error signal to drive VOR adaptation. Using the unilateral incremental VOR adaptation technique and horizontal active head impulses as the vestibular stimulus, we sought to determine the factors important for VOR adaptation including: the total training time, ratio and number of head impulses to each side (adapting and non-adapting sides; the adapting side was pseudo-randomised left or right) and exposure time to the visual target during each head impulse. We tested 11 normal subjects, each over 5 separate sessions and training protocols. The basic training protocol (protocol one) consisted of unilateral incremental VOR adaptation training lasting 15 min with the ratio of head impulses to each side 1:1. Each protocol varied from the basic. For protocol two, the ratio of impulses were in favour of the adapting side by 2:1. For protocol three, all head impulses were towards the adapting side and the training only lasted 7.5 min. For protocol four, all impulses were towards the adapting side and lasted 15 min. For protocol five, all head impulses were to the adapting side and the exposure time to the visual target during each impulse was doubled. We measured the active and passive VOR gains before and after the training. Albeit with small sample size, our data suggest that the total training time and the visual target exposure time for each head impulse affected adaptation, whereas the total number and repetition rate of head impulses did not. These data have implications for vestibular rehabilitation, suggesting that quality and duration of VOR adaptation exercises are more important than rapid repetition of exercises.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 24%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,104,439
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#95
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,650
of 342,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.