↓ Skip to main content

Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00148365-200403040-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Burge, Nancy Devlin, John Appleby, Charlene Rohr, Jonathan Grant

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 19%
Social Sciences 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#247
of 841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,590
of 182,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#13
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.