↓ Skip to main content

McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth: Contingent valuation of environmental goods—a comprehensive critique

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 119)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth: Contingent valuation of environmental goods—a comprehensive critique
Published in
Journal of Economics, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00712-018-0606-4
Authors

Silvia Ferrini, Kerry R. Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,330,183
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economics
#4
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,606
of 326,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them