↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting diagnosis of primary pediatric central nervous system neoplasias in a developing country

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Factors affecting diagnosis of primary pediatric central nervous system neoplasias in a developing country
Published in
Child's Nervous System, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3958-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isadora Olenscki Gilli, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Helder Tedeschi, Simone dos Santos Aguiar, Andre Moreno Morcillo, Enrico Ghizoni

Abstract

Understand the variables that could interfere with diagnosis and prompt treatment in CNS childhood cancer in Brazil, a developing country with continental dimensions. From 2005 to 2010, we retrospectively evaluated factors, which could represent a negative influence on the time period elapsing from the onset of symptoms until the diagnosis of the central nervous system (CNS) neoplasia in children and adolescents attended in our service. Two hundred seventeen records were analyzed retrospectively. Factors of the households were evaluated, and this data was related to the time period elapsing from presentation of the first symptoms until the diagnosis of CNS neoplasia. The average time elapsed from the onset of the symptoms until seeking medical assistance was 96 days, and from medical assistance to patient referral to a reference service was 33 days. The symptoms which most contributed to a shorter delay in diagnosis were changes in gait and paresis, mother's occupation, father's education level, patient gender, and living in the state of São Paulo. Besides that, variables such as male gender, mother's education level, and lower patient age were associated with an early diagnosis time. There is great difficulty in performing early diagnosis of CNS tumors, partly due to parent's inability to recognize signs and symptoms, and in part due to an educational deficit among healthcare professionals. Identification of measures that can minimize these causes of delay is fundamental to increasing the chance of cure and survival of these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 23 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,535,139
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,823
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,205
of 340,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#30
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.