↓ Skip to main content

Key Crowdsourcing Technologies for Product Design and Development

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Intelligence Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Key Crowdsourcing Technologies for Product Design and Development
Published in
Machine Intelligence Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11633-018-1138-7
Authors

Xiao-Jing Niu, Sheng-Feng Qin, John Vines, Rose Wong, Hui Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 41 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 16%
Engineering 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 9%
Design 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 44 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Machine Intelligence Research
#228
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,155
of 351,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Intelligence Research
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.