↓ Skip to main content

Proposal for a descriptive guideline of vascular changes in lesions of the vocal folds by the committee on endoscopic laryngeal imaging of the European Laryngological Society

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Proposal for a descriptive guideline of vascular changes in lesions of the vocal folds by the committee on endoscopic laryngeal imaging of the European Laryngological Society
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00405-015-3851-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Arens, Cesare Piazza, Mario Andrea, Frederik G. Dikkers, Robin E. A. Tjon Pian Gi, Susanne Voigt-Zimmermann, Giorgio Peretti

Abstract

In the last decades new endoscopic tools have been developed to improve the diagnostic work-up of vocal fold lesions in addition to normal laryngoscopy, i.e., contact endoscopy, autofluorescence, narrow band imaging and others. Better contrasted and high definition images offer more details of the epithelial and superficial vascular structure of the vocal folds. Following these developments, particular vascular patterns come into focus during laryngoscopy. The present work aims at a systematic pathogenic description of superficial vascular changes of the vocal folds. Additionally, new nomenclature on vascular lesions of the vocal folds will be presented to harmonize the different terms in the literature. Superficial vascular changes can be divided into longitudinal and perpendicular. Unlike longitudinal vascular lesions, e.g., ectasia, meander and change of direction, perpendicular vascular lesions are characterized by different types of vascular loops. They are primarily observed in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, and in pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions of the vocal folds. These vascular characteristics play a significant role in the differential diagnosis. Among different parameters, e.g., epithelial changes, increase of volume, stiffness of the vocal fold, vascular lesions play an increasing role in the diagnosis of pre- and cancerous lesions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 53%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,379,687
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,542
of 3,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,898
of 365,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.