↓ Skip to main content

Tele‐Derm National

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Rural Health, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tele‐Derm National
Published in
Australian Journal of Rural Health, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/ajr.12248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Byrom, Lex Lucas, Vicki Sheedy, Kim Madison, Lachlan McIver, George Castrisos, Christina Alfonzo, Frank Chiu, Jim Muir

Abstract

To identify the current scope of Tele-Derm, the types of dermatological complaints experienced in the rural primary care setting, and to assess the quality of patient clinical information provided to the consultant dermatologist. Retrospective case analysis. Tele-Derm National is an initiative of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine and has been providing online educational and consultational services in dermatology to doctors Australia-wide for over a decade. Patient cases that were submitted to Tele-Derm for specialist dermatologist advice. Audit of submitted cases. The types of patient presentations and reason for submission for specialist opinion were analysed. The quality of clinical information provided was also evaluated. A total of 406 cases submitted over 2012-2013 were analysed. Most patients were from the outpatient setting with 'rash' or dermatitis (66%). Almost one-third of patients were paediatric cases. The average time from submission to dermatologist reply was 5.5 hours. Clinical photos were provided in 83% of cases and 73% of these were assessed as being of good quality. Management advice was provided in 77% of cases, of which reference to the case-based learning modules on Tele-Derm was made in 21% of cases. Patient outcome was largely unknown (83%). This study identified some of the common dermatological complaints presenting to rural and remote primary care doctors in Australia. The unique addition of professional development in Tele-Derm can be used as an adjunct to advice provided to the rural doctors seeking advice for patient management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Materials Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,398,500
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#444
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,154
of 398,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.