↓ Skip to main content

Can vitamin D slow down the progression of chronic kidney disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Can vitamin D slow down the progression of chronic kidney disease?
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00467-011-2071-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rukshana Shroff, Mandy Wan, Lesley Rees

Abstract

Pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is the cornerstone of renoprotective therapy, and the reduction of persistent RAAS activation is considered to be an important target in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vitamin D is a steroid hormone that controls a broad range of metabolic and cell regulatory functions. It acts as a transcription factor and can suppress the renin gene, thereby acting as a negative endocrine regulator of RAAS. RAAS activation can reduce renal Klotho expression, and the Klotho-fibroblast growth factor 23 interaction may further reduce the production of active vitamin D. Results from both clinical and experimental studies suggest that vitamin D therapy is associated with a reduction in blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy and improves cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, a reduction in angiotensin II through RAAS blockade may have anti-proteinuric and anti-fibrotic effects. Vitamin D has also been shown to modulate the immune system, regulate inflammatory responses, improve insulin sensitivity and reduce high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Taken together, these pleiotropic effects of vitamin D may slow down the progression of CKD. In this review, we discuss the experimental and early clinical findings that suggest a renoprotective effect of vitamin D, thereby providing an additional rationale beyond mineral metabolism for the close monitoring of, and supplementation with vitamin D from the earliest stages of CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,141,030
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,399
of 3,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,252
of 240,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.