| Title |
Combined Endocardial-Epicardial Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation Alone for Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.08.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorge Romero, Roberto C Cerrud-Rodriguez, Luigi Di Biase, Juan Carlos Diaz, Isabella Alviz, Vito Grupposo, Luis Cerna, Ricardo Avendano, Usha Tedrow, Andrea Natale, Roderick Tung, Saurabh Kumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 31% |
| Turkey | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,620,065
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#363
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,663
of 352,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.