| Title |
Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With a Ventricular Assist Device A Systematic Review of Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.08.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert D Anderson, Geoffrey Lee, Sohaib Virk, Richard G Bennett, Christopher S Hayward, Kavitha Muthiah, Jonathan Kalman, Saurabh Kumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 25% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,466,037
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#578
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,892
of 351,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.