↓ Skip to main content

A Case Study of Preferential Bestiality

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
A Case Study of Preferential Bestiality
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9285-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Earls, Martin L. Lalumière

Abstract

In a previous article, we presented phallometric data to illustrate a case of preferential bestiality or zoophilia (Earls & Lalumière, Sex Abuse: J Res Treat, 14:83-88, 2002). Based on the available literature, we argued that a marked preference for having sex with animals over sex with humans is extremely rare. In the present article, we describe a second case of zoophilia that challenges the widely held assumptions that men who have sex with animals are generally of below average intelligence and come from rural areas. In addition, we provide a brief review of a burgeoning quantitative literature using large groups of zoophiles recruited from internet sources. Although estimates of the prevalence of zoophilia are not possible at this time, it appears that zoophilia is not as rare as once thought and shares many features with other atypical sexual interests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 33%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,053,261
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#538
of 3,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,895
of 167,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.