| Title |
Harms and deprivation of benefits for nonhuman primates in research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11017-014-9288-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hope Ferdowsian, Agustín Fuentes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 20% |
| Psychology | 4 | 16% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,432,465
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#221
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,946
of 221,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.