↓ Skip to main content

Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?
Published in
NanoEthics, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11569-011-0132-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johane Patenaude, Georges A. Legault, Jean-Pierre Béland, Monelle Parent, Patrick Boissy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 16 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 35%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,242,730
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#138
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,385
of 140,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.