↓ Skip to main content

The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and animals

Overview of attention for article published in Artificial Intelligence and Law, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 221)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and animals
Published in
Artificial Intelligence and Law, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10506-018-9229-x
Authors

Jiahong Chen, Paul Burgess

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 7%
Arts and Humanities 7 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,499,046
of 24,859,977 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence and Law
#10
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,771
of 347,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence and Law
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,859,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them