↓ Skip to main content

PhenStat: A Tool Kit for Standardized Analysis of High Throughput Phenotypic Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PhenStat: A Tool Kit for Standardized Analysis of High Throughput Phenotypic Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalja Kurbatova, Jeremy C. Mason, Hugh Morgan, Terrence F. Meehan, Natasha A. Karp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Computer Science 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,925,492
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,327
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,605
of 262,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,141
of 6,555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.