↓ Skip to main content

Signing with the Face: Emotional Expression in Narrative Production in Deaf Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Signing with the Face: Emotional Expression in Narrative Production in Deaf Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3756-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Denmark, Joanna Atkinson, Ruth Campbell, John Swettenham

Abstract

This study examined facial expressions produced during a British Sign Language (BSL) narrative task (Herman et al., International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 49(3):343-353, 2014) by typically developing deaf children and deaf children with autism spectrum disorder. The children produced BSL versions of a video story in which two children are seen to enact a language-free scenario where one tricks the other. This task encourages elicitation of facial acts signalling intention and emotion, since the protagonists showed a range of such expressions during the events portrayed. Results showed that typically developing deaf children produced facial expressions which closely aligned with native adult signers' BSL narrative versions of the task. Children with ASD produced fewer targeted expressions and showed qualitative differences in the facial actions that they produced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 44 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Linguistics 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 50 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,930,398
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,278
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,277
of 345,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#29
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.