↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Use of Maize Bran Residue for One-Step Phosphate Bio-Fertilizer Production

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Integrated Use of Maize Bran Residue for One-Step Phosphate Bio-Fertilizer Production
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12010-018-2874-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiyan Zhang, Yong Liu, Gang Wang

Abstract

The development of bio-fertilizer inoculants is important and desirable. Two phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus subtilis strains were inoculated onto maize bran residue (MBR), which was used as bio-fertilizer carrier and a primary source of nutrients in a medium used for semi-solid fermentation. Water holding capacity, swelling capacity, scanning electron microscopy, and shelf-life assays demonstrated that ground MBR had satisfactory properties for a bio-fertilizer carrier. The maximal soluble phosphorus (P) reached 642.7 ± 0.43 mg l-1 in an orthogonal test under the following optimal conditions: a pH of 7.0, a cultivation temperature of 31 °C, a medium water content of 160%, and a filling capacity of 500 g l-1. The bio-fertilizer produced by MBR improved the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa pekinensis) with respect to plant height (by up to 18.36%) and the lengths of roots (by up to 34.03%, 27.22%, separately) in a pot experiment. This study integrated the production and storage of a bio-fertilizer to realize the one-step production of a solid bio-fertilizer using MBR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 46%
Engineering 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,650,639
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1,799
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,436
of 341,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.