↓ Skip to main content

Lessons from other diseases: granulomatous inflammation in leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Lessons from other diseases: granulomatous inflammation in leishmaniasis
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00281-015-0548-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Kaye, Lynette Beattie

Abstract

The Leishmania granuloma shares some, though not all, properties with that formed following mycobacterial infection. As a simplified, noncaseating granuloma composed of relatively few and largely mononuclear cell populations, it provides a tractable model system to investigate intra-granuloma cellular dynamics, immune regulation, and antimicrobial resistance. Here, the occurrence of granulomatous pathology across the spectrum of leishmaniasis, in humans and animal reservoir hosts, is first described. However, this review focuses on the process of hepatic granuloma formation as studied in rodent models of visceral leishmaniasis, starting from the initial infection of Kupffer cells to the involution of the granuloma after pathogen clearance. It describes how the application of intravital imaging and the use of computational modeling have changed some of our thoughts on granuloma function, and illustrates how host-directed therapies have been used to manipulate granuloma form and function for therapeutic benefit. Where appropriate, lessons that may be equally applicable across the spectrum of granulomatous diseases are highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,940,716
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#196
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,268
of 362,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.