↓ Skip to main content

Parsimony and the Fisher–Wright debate

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Parsimony and the Fisher–Wright debate
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10539-004-7044-0
Authors

Anya Plutynski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 5%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 35 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Professor 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 51%
Philosophy 9 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,650,639
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#581
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,500
of 58,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.