↓ Skip to main content

Associations between unprocessed red and processed meat, poultry, seafood and egg intake and the risk of prostate cancer: A pooled analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Associations between unprocessed red and processed meat, poultry, seafood and egg intake and the risk of prostate cancer: A pooled analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/ijc.29973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kana Wu, Donna Spiegelman, Tao Hou, Demetrius Albanes, Naomi E. Allen, Sonja I. Berndt, Piet A. van den Brandt, Graham G. Giles, Edward Giovannucci, R. Alexandra Goldbohm, Gary G. Goodman, Phyllis J. Goodman, Niclas Håkansson, Manami Inoue, Timothy J. Key, Laurence N. Kolonel, Satu Männistö, Marjorie L. McCullough, Marian L. Neuhouser, Yikyung Park, Elizabeth A. Platz, Jeannette M. Schenk, Rashmi Sinha, Meir J. Stampfer, Victoria L. Stevens, Shoichiro Tsugane, Kala Visvanathan, Lynne R. Wilkens, Alicja Wolk, Regina G. Ziegler, Stephanie A. Smith‐Warner

Abstract

Reports relating meat intake to prostate cancer risk are inconsistent. Associations between these dietary factors and prostate cancer were examined in a consortium of 15 cohort studies. During follow-up, 52,683 incident prostate cancer cases, including 4,924 advanced cases, were identified among 842, 149 men. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate study-specific relative risks (RR) and then pooled using random effects models. Results do not support a substantial effect of total red, unprocessed red and processed meat for all prostate cancer outcomes, except for a modest positive association for tumors identified as advanced stage at diagnosis (advanced(r)). For seafood, no substantial effect was observed for prostate cancer regardless of stage or grade. Poultry intake was inversely associated with risk of advanced and fatal cancers (pooled multivariable RR [MVRR], 95% confidence interval, comparing ≥45 vs. <5 g/d: advanced 0.83, 0.70-0.99; trend test p-value 0.29), fatal, 0.69, 0.59-0.82, trend test p-value 0.16). Participants who ate ≥25 vs <5 g/d of eggs (1 egg ∼ 50 g) had a significant 14% increased risk of advanced and fatal cancers (MVRR: advanced 1.14, 1.01-1.28, trend test p-value 0.01; fatal 1.14, 1.00-1.30, trend test p-value 0.01). When associations were analyzed separately by geographical region (North America vs. other continents), positive associations between unprocessed red meat and egg intake, and inverse associations between poultry intake and advanced, advanced(r) and fatal cancers were limited to North American studies. However, differences were only statistically significant for eggs. Observed differences in associations by geographical region warrant further investigation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,138,747
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#771
of 12,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,692
of 314,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#12
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.