↓ Skip to main content

LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor applications: A foregone conclusion?

Overview of attention for article published in Building Simulation, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor applications: A foregone conclusion?
Published in
Building Simulation, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3
Authors

Bert Blocken

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 390 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 22%
Student > Master 53 14%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 114 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 156 40%
Environmental Science 24 6%
Energy 18 5%
Design 13 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 148 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Building Simulation
#107
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,420
of 343,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Building Simulation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.