↓ Skip to main content

Design and respondent selection of a population-based study on associations between breast cancer screening, lifestyle and quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Design and respondent selection of a population-based study on associations between breast cancer screening, lifestyle and quality of life
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2603-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tytti Sarkeala, Sirpa Heinävaara, Jonna Fredman, Satu Männistö, Riitta Luoto, Maija Jäntti, Nea Malila

Abstract

Only few studies have integrated breast cancer screening, lifestyle, and quality of life. Potential bias due to selective non-response may disrupt associations being investigated. We describe the design of a Finnish population-based study on associations between breast cancer screening and various indicators for lifestyle and quality of life, and evaluate the level of bias among the respondents from the first study rounds over 2 years. The study target population of 10 000, 49-year-old women was randomly drawn from the Finnish National Population Registry. The data included birth year, marital status, municipality, and primary language. Data on education were retrieved from Statistics Finland. Questionnaires focusing on lifestyle-related risk factors and quality of life were sent to the target population in 2012-13, 1 year before the first invitation to organized breast cancer screening. We evaluated associations between willingness to respond and demographic characteristics in the eligible study population. Additionally, we examined associations between the demographic characteristics and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and evaluated the impact of non-response using inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation. The questionnaire response proportion was 52.4 %. Compared to non-respondents, respondents were more often married, academically educated, and native speakers of Finnish or Swedish. Nevertheless, the estimates of the SWLS among the respondents were in line with those corrected by non-response in the eligible study population. Based on the SWLS, the respondents are representative of women in the entire eligible study population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,298,249
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,905
of 14,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,790
of 388,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#233
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.