↓ Skip to main content

RIP1 and RIP3 complex regulates radiation-induced programmed necrosis in glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
RIP1 and RIP3 complex regulates radiation-induced programmed necrosis in glioblastoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4621-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arabinda Das, Daniel G. McDonald, Yaenette N. Dixon-Mah, Dustin J. Jacqmin, Vikram N. Samant, William A. Vandergrift, Scott M. Lindhorst, David Cachia, Abhay K. Varma, Kenneth N. Vanek, Naren L. Banik, Joseph M. Jenrette, Jeffery J. Raizer, Pierre Giglio, Sunil J. Patel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,862,781
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#390
of 2,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,864
of 395,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#32
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.