| Title |
Manipulating mRNA splicing by base editing in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Life Sciences, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11427-018-9392-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenxiao Xue, Huawei Zhang, Qiupeng Lin, Rong Fan, Caixia Gao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,137,994
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#118
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,366
of 355,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.