↓ Skip to main content

Transthyretin and the brain re-visited: Is neuronal synthesis of transthyretin protective in Alzheimer's disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transthyretin and the brain re-visited: Is neuronal synthesis of transthyretin protective in Alzheimer's disease?
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-6-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinyi Li, Joel N Buxbaum

Abstract

Since the mid-1990's a trickle of publications from scattered independent laboratories have presented data suggesting that the systemic amyloid precursor transthyretin (TTR) could interact with the amyloidogenic β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The notion that one amyloid precursor could actually inhibit amyloid fibril formation by another seemed quite far-fetched. Further it seemed clear that within the CNS, TTR was only produced in choroid plexus epithelial cells, not in neurons. The most enthusiastic of the authors proclaimed that TTR sequestered Aβ in vivo resulting in a lowered TTR level in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients and that the relationship was salutary. More circumspect investigators merely showed in vitro interaction between the two molecules. A single in vivo study in Caenorhabditis elegans suggested that wild type human TTR could suppress the abnormalities seen when Aβ was expressed in the muscle cells of the worm. Subsequent studies in human Aβ transgenic mice, including those from our laboratory, also suggested that the interaction reduced the Aβ deposition phenotype. We have reviewed the literature analyzing the relationship including recent data examining potential mechanisms that could explain the effect. We have proposed a model which is consistent with most of the published data and current notions of AD pathogenesis and can serve as a hypothesis which can be tested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Chemistry 8 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#702
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,649
of 245,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.