↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange and Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins: a Structural Characterisation of Wild-Type and ΔN6 β2-Microglobulin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange and Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins: a Structural Characterisation of Wild-Type and ΔN6 β2-Microglobulin
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13361-018-2067-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Owen Cornwell, Sheena E. Radford, Alison E. Ashcroft, James R. Ault

Abstract

Hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) is a well-established technique employed in the field of structural MS to probe the solvent accessibility, dynamics and hydrogen bonding of backbone amides in proteins. By contrast, fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP) uses hydroxyl radicals, liberated from the photolysis of hydrogen peroxide, to covalently label solvent accessible amino acid side chains on the microsecond-millisecond timescale. Here, we use these two techniques to study the structural and dynamical differences between the protein β2-microglobulin (β2m) and its amyloidogenic truncation variant, ΔN6. We show that HDX and FPOP highlight structural/dynamical differences in regions of the proteins, localised to the region surrounding the N-terminal truncation. Further, we demonstrate that, with carefully optimised LC-MS conditions, FPOP data can probe solvent accessibility at the sub-amino acid level, and that these data can be interpreted meaningfully to gain more detailed understanding of the local environment and orientation of the side chains in protein structures. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 33%
Chemistry 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,142,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#73
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,908
of 351,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.