↓ Skip to main content

Carbon dioxide is an absolute requirement for exsheathment of some, but not all, abomasal nematode species

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Carbon dioxide is an absolute requirement for exsheathment of some, but not all, abomasal nematode species
Published in
Parasitology Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-6094-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiliana Bekelaar, Tania Waghorn, Michael Tavendale, Catherine McKenzie, Dave Leathwick

Abstract

The first step in the infection process of grazing ruminants by gastrointestinal nematodes is the exsheathment of the third-stage larva (L3). Exsheathment of various species can be achieved in vitro using carbon dioxide (CO2) under the appropriate temperature and pH conditions. However, it remains unclear whether elevated CO2 levels are an absolute requirement for exsheathment. Exsheathment of four abomasal species was investigated in both the presence and absence of CO2, in either rumen fluid (cow or sheep) or buffer (standard or enriched). Exsheathment of Ostertagia ostertagi, Teladorsagia circumcincta and Ostertagia leptospicularis was observed in CO2-depleted rumen fluid and enriched buffer (respectively 46%, 22% and 15% in rumen fluid and 28% 18% and 26% in enriched buffer after 24 h). The level of this response was dependent on the species as well as the medium, and exsheathment was significantly higher in the presence of CO2. For Haemonchus contortus, exsheathment could only be achieved under CO2-saturated conditions. In conclusion, even though these parasite species exsheath in the same environment, there were significant differences in the minimal requirements to trigger their exsheathment. Some abomasal species were capable of exsheathment in the absence of CO2, which is likely facilitated by cofactors present in the rumen fluid and/or enriched buffer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 40%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,991,384
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#2,097
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,306
of 341,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#27
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.