↓ Skip to main content

Microbial nitrogen removal of ammonia wastewater in poly (butylenes succinate)-based constructed wetland: effect of dissolved oxygen

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Microbial nitrogen removal of ammonia wastewater in poly (butylenes succinate)-based constructed wetland: effect of dissolved oxygen
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9386-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huaqing Liu, Zhen Hu, Yijin Zhang, Jian Zhang, Huijun Xie, Shuang Liang

Abstract

Constructed wetland (CW) is popular in wastewater treatment for its prominent advantage of low construction and operation cost. However, the nitrogen removal in conventional CW is usually limited by the low dissolved oxygen (DO) and insufficient electron donor. This paper investigated the nitrogen removal performance and mechanisms in the poly (butylenes succinate)-based CW (PBS-CW) while treating ammonia wastewater under different DO levels. The average DO contents in limited-aeration and full-aeration phases were 1.68 mg L-1 and 5.71 mg L-1, respectively. Results indicated that, with the ammonia nitrogen loading rate of 25 g N m-3 day-1, total nitrogen removal ratios in the PBS-CW under the limited-aeration and full-aeration phases were 72% and 99%, respectively. Combined analyses revealed that simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) via nitrite/nitrate were the main microbial nitrogen removal pathways in the aeration phase of the PBS-CW (> 89%). The microbial carrier of biodegradable material was believed to play a significant role in prompting SND performance while dealing with low C/N wastewater. Due to the coexistence of micro-anaerobic zone and carbon supply inside the coated biofilm, the high DO level in the PBS-CW increased the abundance of the nitrifying bacteria (amoA and nxrA), denitrifying bacteria (narG, nirK, nirS, and nosZ), and even anammox bacteria (anammox 16s rRNA). These features are beneficial to many microbial processes which require the simultaneous aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 23%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,994
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,153
of 345,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#90
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.