↓ Skip to main content

Political parties and corruption: Ten hypotheses on five vicious circles

Overview of attention for article published in Crime, Law and Social Change, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Political parties and corruption: Ten hypotheses on five vicious circles
Published in
Crime, Law and Social Change, August 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:cris.0000041036.85056.c6
Authors

Donatella della Porta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 35 61%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Crime, Law and Social Change
#195
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,766
of 61,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crime, Law and Social Change
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.