You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1086/595011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen W. Boucher, George H. Talbot, John S. Bradley, John E. Edwards, David Gilbert, Louis B. Rice, Michael Scheld, Brad Spellberg, John Bartlett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 31% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| Denmark | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3490 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 661 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 515 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 476 | 13% |
| Researcher | 373 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 188 | 5% |
| Other | 631 | 18% |
| Unknown | 755 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 612 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 526 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 508 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 340 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 293 | 8% |
| Other | 460 | 13% |
| Unknown | 860 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#270,119
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#570
of 16,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#795
of 187,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.