↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Key Tenets of Heidegger’s Philosophy for Interpretive Phenomenological Research

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the Key Tenets of Heidegger’s Philosophy for Interpretive Phenomenological Research
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, November 2016
DOI 10.1177/1609406916680634
Authors

Marcella Horrigan-Kelly, Michelle Millar, Maura Dowling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 674 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 21%
Student > Master 106 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 84 12%
Researcher 36 5%
Lecturer 30 4%
Other 109 16%
Unknown 166 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 132 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 62 9%
Psychology 58 9%
Arts and Humanities 52 8%
Other 103 15%
Unknown 185 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#451
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,802
of 415,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.