↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Orientation, Race, and Trauma as Predictors of Sexual Assault Recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family Violence, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Orientation, Race, and Trauma as Predictors of Sexual Assault Recovery
Published in
Journal of Family Violence, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10896-015-9793-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rannveig Sigurvinsdottir, Sarah E. Ullman

Abstract

Sexual minorities and racial minorities experience greater negative impact following sexual assault. We examined recovery from sexual assault among women who identified as heterosexual and bisexual across racial groups. A community sample of women (N = 905) completed three yearly surveys about sexual victimization, recovery outcomes, race group, and sexual minority status. Bisexual women and Black women reported greater recovery problems. However, Black women improved more quickly on depression symptoms than non-Black women. Finally, repeated adult victimization uniquely undermined survivors' recovery, even when controlling for child sexual abuse. Sexual minority and race status variables and their intersections with revictimization play roles in recovery and should be considered in treatment protocols for sexual assault survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 33%
Social Sciences 41 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,128,811
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Violence
#69
of 1,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,432
of 401,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Violence
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.