| Title |
From early intervention in psychosis to youth mental health reform: a review of the evolution and transformation of mental health services for young people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00127-015-1165-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashok Malla, Srividya Iyer, Patrick McGorry, Mary Cannon, Helen Coughlan, Swaran Singh, Peter Jones, Ridha Joober |
| Abstract |
The objective of this review is to report on recent developments in youth mental health incorporating all levels of severity of mental disorders encouraged by progress in the field of early intervention in psychotic disorders, research in deficiencies in the current system and social advocacy. The authors have briefly reviewed the relevant current state of knowledge, challenges and the service and research response across four countries (Australia, Ireland, the UK and Canada) currently active in the youth mental health field. Here we present information on response to principal challenges associated with improving youth mental services in each country. Australia has developed a model comprised of a distinct front-line youth mental health service (Headspace) to be implemented across the country and initially stimulated by success in early intervention in psychosis; in Ireland, Headstrong has been driven primarily through advocacy and philanthropy resulting in front-line services (Jigsaw) which are being implemented across different jurisdictions; in the UK, a limited regional response has addressed mostly problems with transition from child-adolescent to adult mental health services; and in Canada, a national multi-site research initiative involving transformation of youth mental health services has been launched with public and philanthropic funding, with the expectation that results of this study will inform implementation of a transformed model of service across the country including indigenous peoples. There is evidence that several countries are now engaged in transformation of youth mental health services and in evaluation of these initiatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 269 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 22% |
| Unknown | 83 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 50 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 98 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#18,530,416
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2,163
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,484
of 392,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.