↓ Skip to main content

Random sampling and machine learning to understand good decompositions

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Random sampling and machine learning to understand good decompositions
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-3067-9
Authors

S. Basso, A. Ceselli, A. Tettamanzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Mathematics 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,936,964
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#316
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,453
of 341,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.