↓ Skip to main content

Clinician Guide to Microbiome Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Clinician Guide to Microbiome Testing
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10620-018-5299-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Staley, Thomas Kaiser, Alexander Khoruts

Abstract

Recent recognition that the intestinal microbiome plays potential roles in the pathogenesis of multiple common diseases has led to a growing interest in personalized microbiome analysis among clinical investigators and patients. Permissibility of direct access testing has allowed the emergence of commercial companies offering microbiome analysis to patients seeking to gain a better understanding of their symptoms and disease conditions. In turn, physicians are often asked to help with interpretation of such tests or even requested by their patients to order them. Therefore, physicians need to have a basic understanding of the current state of microbiome science. This review examines how the perspective of microbial ecology, which is fundamental to understanding the microbiome, updates the classical version of the germ theory of disease. We provide the essential vocabulary of microbiome science and describe its current limitations. We look forward to the future when microbiome diagnostics may live up to its potential of becoming integral to clinical care that will become increasingly individualized, and microbiome analysis may become incorporated into that future paradigm. However, we caution patients and providers that the current microbiome tests, given the state of knowledge and technology, do not provide much value in clinical decisions. Considerable research remains to be carried out to make this objective a reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#810,639
of 24,818,814 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#62
of 4,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,778
of 347,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,818,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.