↓ Skip to main content

Progress of analytical tools and techniques for human gut microbiome research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 838)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Progress of analytical tools and techniques for human gut microbiome research
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12275-018-8238-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun-Ji Song, Eun-Sook Lee, Young-Do Nam

Abstract

Massive DNA sequencing studies have expanded our insights and understanding of the ecological and functional characteristics of the gut microbiome. Advanced sequencing technologies allow us to understand the close association of the gut microbiome with human health and critical illnesses. In the future, analyses of the gut microbiome will provide key information associating with human individual health, which will help provide personalized health care for diseases. Numerous molecular biological analysis tools have been rapidly developed and employed for the gut microbiome researches; however, methodological differences among researchers lead to inconsistent data, limiting extensive share of data. It is therefore very essential to standardize the current methodologies and establish appropriate pipelines for human gut microbiome research. Herein, we review the methods and procedures currently available for studying the human gut microbiome, including fecal sample collection, metagenomic DNA extraction, massive DNA sequencing, and data analyses with bioinformatics. We believe that this review will contribute to the progress of gut microbiome research in the clinical and practical aspects of human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 10 6%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 50 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,704,870
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#16
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,788
of 345,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.