| Title |
Correction to: The association between the inflammatory potential of diet and risk of developing, and survival following, a diagnosis of ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-018-1816-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. M. Nagle, T. Ibiebele, N. Shivappa, J. R. Hébert, A. DeFazio, P. M. Webb, for the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study |
| Abstract |
In the original publication of this article on page 6, paragraph "Discussion", line 4, 'In a U.S. population-based case-control study (n = 493 cases) Peres et al., reported a non-significant association between DII score and risk of developing ovarian cancer of similar magnitude (OR DII scoreQ4 vs. Q1 1.35, 95% CI 0.93-1.97) [20]'. It should read as 'In a U.S. population-based case-control study (n = 493 cases) Peres et al., reported a significant association between DII score and risk of developing ovarian cancer (OR DII scoreQ4 vs. Q1 1.72, 95% CI 1.18-2.51) [20]'. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,991,384
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,876
of 2,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,088
of 341,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#32
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.