| Title |
Sedimentology and environmental interpretation of the Coniacian deposits in the Saharan platform (SE Tunisia)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbonates and Evaporites, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13146-015-0280-3 |
| Authors |
Amna Khila, Mohamed Ouaja, Fouad Zargouni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#21,476,880
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Carbonates and Evaporites
#91
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,253
of 393,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbonates and Evaporites
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.