↓ Skip to main content

Ecological Divergence with Gene Flow in a Thermophilic Cyanobacterium

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Ecological Divergence with Gene Flow in a Thermophilic Cyanobacterium
Published in
Microbial Ecology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00248-018-1267-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott R. Miller, Darla Carvey

Abstract

How ecological diversity is maintained and distributed within populations is a longstanding question in microbial ecology. In the thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus B', high observed levels of recombination are predicted to maintain ecological variation despite the simultaneous action of diverse selective pressures on different regions of the genome. To investigate ecological diversity in these bacteria, we directly isolated laboratory strains of Synechococcus B' from samples collected along the thermal gradients of two geothermal environments in Yellowstone National Park. Extensive recombination was evident for a multi-locus sequence data set, and, consequently, our sample did not exhibit the sequence clustering expected for distinct ecotypes evolving by periodic clonal selection. Evidence for local selective sweeps at specific loci suggests that sweeps may be common but that recombination is effective for maintaining diversity of unlinked genomic regions. Thermal performance for strain growth was positively associated with the temperature of the environment, indicating that Synechococcus B' populations consist of locally adapted ecological specialists that occupy specific thermal niches. Because this ecological differentiation is observed despite the absence of dispersal barriers among sites, we conclude that these bacteria may freely exchange much of the genome but that barriers to gene flow exist for loci under direct temperature selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,527,706
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,196
of 2,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,385
of 342,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.