You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Change in Deep Cervical Flexor Activity After Training Is Associated With the Degree of Pain Reduction in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical journal of pain, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31823e9378 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Falla, Shaun O’Leary, Dario Farina, Gwendolen Jull |
| Abstract |
Altered activation of the deep cervical flexors (longus colli and longus capitis) has been found in individuals with neck pain disorders but the response to training has been variable. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between change in deep cervical flexor muscle activity and symptoms in response to specific training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Norway | 2 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 21% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,706,153
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#493
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,483
of 188,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.