↓ Skip to main content

Neurobiology of the major psychoses: a translational perspective on brain structure and function—the FOR2107 consortium

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Neurobiology of the major psychoses: a translational perspective on brain structure and function—the FOR2107 consortium
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00406-018-0943-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tilo Kircher, Markus Wöhr, Igor Nenadic, Rainer Schwarting, Gerhard Schratt, Judith Alferink, Carsten Culmsee, Holger Garn, Tim Hahn, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Astrid Dempfle, Maik Hahmann, Andreas Jansen, Petra Pfefferle, Harald Renz, Marcella Rietschel, Stephanie H. Witt, Markus Nöthen, Axel Krug, Udo Dannlowski

Abstract

Genetic (G) and environmental (E) factors are involved in the etiology and course of the major psychoses (MP), i.e. major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), schizoaffective disorder (SZA) and schizophrenia (SZ). The neurobiological correlates by which these predispositions exert their influence on brain structure, function and course of illness are poorly understood. In the FOR2107 consortium, animal models and humans are investigated. A human cohort of MP patients, healthy subjects at genetic and/or environmental risk, and control subjects (N = 2500) has been established. Participants are followed up after 2 years and twice underwent extensive deep phenotyping (MR imaging, clinical course, neuropsychology, personality, risk/protective factors, biomaterials: blood, stool, urine, hair, saliva). Methods for data reduction, quality assurance for longitudinal MRI data, and (deep) machine learning techniques are employed. In the parallelised animal cluster, genetic risk was introduced by a rodent model (Cacna1c deficiency) and its interactions with environmental risk and protective factors are studied. The animals are deeply phenotyped regarding cognition, emotion, and social function, paralleling the variables assessed in humans. A set of innovative experimental projects connect and integrate data from the human and animal parts, investigating the role of microRNA, neuroplasticity, immune signatures, (epi-)genetics and gene expression. Biomaterial from humans and animals are analyzed in parallel. The FOR2107 consortium will delineate pathophysiological entities with common neurobiological underpinnings ("biotypes") and pave the way for an etiologic understanding of the MP, potentially leading to their prevention, the prediction of individual disease courses, and novel therapies in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 11%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Master 23 8%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 94 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 16%
Neuroscience 35 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 108 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,990,786
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#808
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,964
of 343,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.