↓ Skip to main content

Redescription de Agfa flexilis (Nematoda: Agfidae) parasite de l'appareil génital de Limax cinereoniger (Gastropoda: Limacidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Parasitology, February 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Redescription de Agfa flexilis (Nematoda: Agfidae) parasite de l'appareil génital de Limax cinereoniger (Gastropoda: Limacidae)
Published in
Systematic Parasitology, February 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00009990
Authors

Serge Morand, Gérard Hommay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 14%
South Africa 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 71%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,469,754
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#149
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,520
of 58,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them